Investment Princple Articles
Articles are written with the goal to educate and
simplify the fundamental financial and investing topics. Information gathered
for these articles are researched from credible websites, texts, and notes.
Capital Structure: Why it Matters
-
4/20/10
Assets = Liabilities + Equity. This is the basis for the Balance Sheet and thus
one of the important factors an investor uses to value a company. Generally the
more Assets a company has while keeping its Liabilities low is a good thing,
thus increasing its Equity. These partial shares of Equity are what investors
are trying to price, and if an investor is long they want Equity to be as high
as possible. Still there are important factors in determining how well a company
has done in funding its operations, or its Capital Structure, and thus the value
of its stock. Capital Structure is the right side of the Balance Sheet equation,
and how the two are put together does matter a good deal to the market.
The leading theory in Capital Structure is the Modigliani-Miller Theorem. The
Theorem says that in the absence of taxes, bankruptcy costs, transaction costs
and that corporations and individuals can borrow at the same rate, that the
Capital Structure of a firm does not matter. All of those assumptions though
exist in the real world, thus the Capital Structure of a firm does matter.
Two of the bigger assumptions of the MMI Theorem are taxes and bankruptcy cost.
Tax laws allow for the payment of interest to be deducted from income. Thus in a
firm’s Capital Structure the more in Debt that operations are financed the
larger the savings that can be realized. But if bankruptcy is considered then
the more Debt a firm borrows the higher rate a rate they will have to borrow at
(all other things remaining constant). So there is a trade-off between taking on
more Debt and the higher interest that the firm will have to pay to do so.
There is generally not considered to be an optimal level of Debt/Equity
trade-off to make a firm’s Capital Structure perfect. A firm may want to make
itself highly leveraged (take on a lot of Debt) in order to rapidly expand
operations or acquisitions, thereby growing the true value of the firm. On the
flip side a firm may be forced to take on more Debt because it has no other way
of continuing its operations, simply to sustain rather than grow. A more
conservative firm may choose rather to finance its operations through internal
financing which is cheaper but takes longer. Higher leverage can be a great tool
is used by a firm that has solid earnings and operations to begin with, but also
magnify problems in firms that are operating poorly. Conservative investors will
probably like firms which have less Debt on their Balance Sheet, while
aggressive investors might desire more Debt for potential growth. Either way
Debt simply magnifies whether a company is operating well or poorly. A good way
to measure this is the DuPont Ratio. Profit Margins and Asset Turnover measure
how well a firm is operating and the Equity Multiplier measures a firm’s
leverage and compounds on their operating record. This Ratio is used well across
industry competitors, as well as the Debt/Equity Ratio.